Skip to content

No Comments

Wiki Wednesday: Vehicle-Miles Traveled

highway_vehicle_miles_traveled.gif
Until recently, VMT had been rising steeply in the U.S.

In the second installment of our serialized tour through StreetsWiki, we turn to DianaD's entry on Vehicle-Miles Traveled:

Vehicle-Miles Traveled (VMT) is the total number of miles driven by all residential vehicles within a given time period and geographic area.

We're seeing more about VMT in the national media as rising gas prices cause people to drive less. Largely absent from the coverage -- so far -- is a discussion about intentionally reducing VMT through policy. Will that change soon? It should: A landscape that's easier to navigate without a car is one where expensive gas won't put such a crimp in household budgets. Diana's wiki entry highlights one avenue to explore in particular:

Land use -- namely sprawl development -- is the main culprit. Americans are living farther from work, school, shopping and basic services. Even in higher density areas, where amenities may be closer to home, the road framework can be punishing for pedestrians. It is nearly impossible to walk in areas that cater to cars instead of people. Autocentric street design therefore forces even more cars onto roadways, which further impedes walkers and bicyclists. The vicious cycle continues and local governments turn to the only “quick fix” that they seem to know: build bigger highways (at enormous taxpayer expense) to accommodate the increased traffic.

Got more to add? Any member of the Livable Streets Network can edit a StreetsWiki entry. 

No Comments

Counting Down to Tomorrow’s Metro Board Meeting

Tomorrow is the Metro Board of Directors Meeting where the fate of the proposed sales tax proposal will be discussed and voted on for the final time. Before their ballot measure can be voted upon by the general public, it must also be approved by the state legislature.

There's a lot of things that still have to be decided before tomorrow's vote. I'll try to cover the major issues that are still on the table.

First, even though the most recent proposed expenditure plan has allocated so much money for the Gold Line that local papers are referring to the sales tax as the Gold Line Tax, San Gabriel Valley legislators are still not happy with the final proposal. This morning, the Bottleneck Blog reported that the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and the Gold Line Phase II Joint Powers Authority don't believe they'll see a completed Gold Line under the current scheme.

Of course, regular readers of this blog know there is a full blown movement to dedicate 1% of the budget for bicycles and another 1% for pedestrians. While some individual Board Members have shown interest in the proposal, there's no telling if it will gain any traction at tomorrow's meeting.

Environmentalists are also concerned about the lack of language mandating that bus service will be expanded under the sales tax plan. The current proposal does spell out that:

3. Operations money would be used for all the items described under Point 4 - Better Public Transportation, especially including:
4-A. Metro Rapid Improvements

4-C. Local Bus Improvements

4-D. Dedicated Bus Lanes

4-H. Fare Equity

However, it doesn't specify that any of those funds would be set aside for bus system expansion. Changing that language could prove a critical point in winning the approval of the Bus Rider's Union.

San Gabriel Valley isn't the only Valley with politicians opposing Metro's plans. Two City Councilmen from the San Fernando Valley spoke at last week's Council Meeting against the plan and could prove an obstacle when it comes to the November ballot.

Last, Board Member Michael Antonovich will propose an amendment that funds from the sales tax be spent proportionally based on population so that smaller municipalities aren't left out.

Because tomorrow is going to be another long, well attended meeting; I recommend getting there early before all the comfortable seats are taken.

Photo: Mastery of Maps/Flickr

2 Comments

Robert Novak Cited in Possible Hit-and-Run

7_23_08_novak.jpgPolitico is reporting that conservative columnist Robert Novak, a.k.a. "The Prince of Darkness," hit a 66-year-old pedestrian with his black Corvette this morning in Washington D.C. and then drove away.

Some of the facts don't quite seem to add up just yet -- specifically the part about the Novak not knowing he hit someone and an eye-witness saying the victim was "sort of splayed onto the windshield."

"I didn't know I hit him. I feel terrible," a shaken Novak told reporters from Politico and WJLA as he was returning to his car. "He's not dead, that's the main thing." Novak said he was a block away from 18th and K streets Northwest, where the accident occurred, when a bicyclist stopped him and said, "You hit someone." He said he was cited for failing to yield the right of way.

The bicyclist was David Bono, a partner at Harkins Cunningham, who was on his usual bike commute to work at 1700 K St. N.W. when he witnessed the accident.

As he traveled east on K Street, crossing 18th, Bono said a "black Corvette convertible with top closed plowed into the guy. The guy is sort of splayed onto the windshield."

Bono said that the pedestrian, who was crossing the street on a "Walk" signal and was in the crosswalk, rolled off the windshield and that Novak then made a right into the service lane of K Street. "The car is speeding away. What's going through my mind is, you just can't hit a pedestrian and drive away," Bono said.

Apparently, Novak's got a rep as an aggressive driver, Again, from Jonathan Martin and Chris Frates at Politico:

Continue...
No Comments

Print This

Thanks to Anil Makhijani, the Open Planning Project's crack web developer, it's now a whole lot easier to print a Streetsblog story. Click the little printer icon below. You'll get a web page formatted 8.5 x 11 with all of the links annotated at the bottom as footnotes. Check it out.
2 Comments

Streetsbloggers Write on Future of Car Sharing in LA

The following letter will be faxed to all the members of the City Council Transportation Committee.  The letter is a compilation of reader comments to an article asking for people’s opinions whether or not the city should set aside dedicated parking for car sharing programs.

Given the success of this article, expect others soliciting reader’s opinions for the purpose of informing elected leaders of your opinions.  The letter is available after the jump.

Continue...

17 Comments

Get Your Signatures in for Bike-Ped Letter to Metro Board


One of LA's Less Attractive Bus Stops

The campaign to urge the Metro Board to include a set aside for bicycle and pedestrian projects in its sales tax expenditure plan is almost over.  Thanks to support from the LACBC, CICLE, Midnight Ridazz, Westside BikeSIDE, the Latino Urban Forum, Streetsblog and many others, the letter has been "signed" over 170 times.  Early this afternoon, I'll be faxing the letter to Metro's Board of Directors.  If you're seeing this letter anytime on July 23rd, you can still "sign" the letter by leaving a comment below or sending an email to metroletter@live.com.  Any signature received before midnight will be included with the final letter given to the Board tomorrow.

A copy of the letter and all the signatures received as of 11:30 this morning can be found after the jump.  If I've mis-pelled your name or excluded you, some of the hand signature people have given me were less than readable, please drop me a line.

Continue...

2 Comments

Today’s Headlines

No Comments

Cartoon Tuesday: Drilling Deeper

7_22_08_cartoon.gif

Nick Anderson / Houston Chronicle

15 Comments

Councilman Tom LaBonge Talks Bikes and His Recent Trip to Europe

(Last Friday before the City Council Meeting, City Councilman Tom LaBonge sat down with Streetsblog to discuss some of the things he noticed on a recent trip to Europe and what Los Angeles can do to make the city a better place for cyclists.  You can leave feedback here, or join LaBonge and myself tomorrow night on the "Positively 4th Street" bike ride beginning at 3255 West 4th Street at 6 P.M.)

Streetsblog: So you were just in Europe.  Were you on vacation or there for city business?

LaBonge: It was a combination there of.  My wife Bridget and I were there for our 20th Wedding Anniversary and I was there on a program of the State Department in Bordeaux, France and went to Berlin on the invitation of the ambassador for the opening of the new embassy.  We’re Sister Cities with both cities.

Streetsblog: Last week at the Transportation Committee hearing, you talked about some of the things you experienced while in Europe.  You spent a lot of time on a bike...

LaBonge: Right.  Of the six days in Berlin, four of them...Fat Tire Bike Rentals in Alexanderplatz is the place to go.  It was a wonderful experience.  The people of Berlin, I don’t know the exact numbers, but a high percentage of them commute by bicycle. 

There’s a unique layout of the city.  It’s one-third developed, one-third green space, and one-third water.  After the horrors of the last century destroyed the city, there was a lot of thought and process has been made to make it a better city.  They built cycling into the regular flow of traffic

Streetsblog: What were some of the things that were different there?

LaBonge: One thing I liked.  They had signalized intersections with the tri-lights for vehicles and at eye level for bicyclists there were signals at eye level right on the post.  They also had clearly marked lines for bike lanes on many roads.  They also brought the bikes off the street between the sidewalk and the curb with their very own bike path, if you will.

7_22_08_labonge_2.JPG

But the most important thing, and this could take awhile for the people of Los Angeles to change, the motorists had great respect for people on bikes.  I never felt anyone on my tail.  If we were going straight and they were turning right, they waited for me to get through the intersection.  Nobody cut me off .  It was amazing.  You immediately felt that there was some respect for the bicycle.

Continue...

5 Comments

Ad Nauseam: Pump

John McCain released a new television advertisement where he promises relief at the gas pump for working families by increasing oil drilling in America.

The ad begins by showing an old fashioned gas pump as a voice darkly intones, “Gas prices, $5, $% no end in site.”  Then, as the image changes to rapidly rising pump numbers, the very serious voice continues, “Because some in Washington are saying ‘no’ to drilling in America.  No to independence to foreign oil.”

As an image of Barack Obama appears on the screen as the voice continues, “Who can you blame for rising prices at the pump?”  A crowd chants, “OBAMA, OBAMA, OBAMA!”

The screen changes to John McCain talking with a microphone as the narrator continues, “One man knows we must drill more of America and rescue our family budgets.  Don’t hope for more energy.  Vote for it.”   

Wow.  Where to start?

Continue...